Thursday, October 23, 2014

Habitual liar Doug Ford denies he called female reporter "a little bitch"; Toronto students fight back against bigoted school trustee

Several journalists have reported that Toronto mayoral candidate Doug Ford, the thuggish brother of Rob Ford, said after last night's CTV debate: "I can't stand that little bitch." 

Ford was referring to Toronto Star reporter Jennifer Pagliaro after a post-debate media scrum.   The comment was heard by Star photojournalist Lucas Oleniuk and a CTV producer.

DoFo is, big surprise, denying he said it.  Of course, DoFo, like his brother, is a habitual liar and has lied repeatedly to the public during this election campaign.  We saw the latest examples of Doug Ford's inaccuracies during last night's debate. 

Monday night's crushing defeat for the Fords can't come soon enough!


In other news, I'm glad that some Toronto high school students are speaking out eloquently against homophobic bigot school trustee Sam Sotiropoulos, whom they want suspended for his comments about the Gay Pride parade, which they feel are homophobic, and for suggesting transgendered students could be mentally ill.

“If a student tweeted something like that, we’d be suspended, or at the very least we’d have to write an essay about the negative impact it has on school climate,” argued Grade 11 student Georgia Koumantaros of Malvern Collegiate.  

The students made their comments while addressing the  Toronto District School Board's Administration, Finance and Accountability committee meeting Wednesday.  Officials responded they can't suspend Sotiropoulos, but trustees at the committee meeting gave the students a round of applause, although it is not clear whether the issue of Sotiropoulos’s tweets will be referred on for future discussion.

For more information on Sotiropoulos' bigoted comments, check out my previous blog post about him.  
He's brought enough shame to the board and his community of Scarborough-Agincourt.  I remain hopeful that his opponent, Manna Wong, will be able to turf the bigot from the board in Monday's election.

Rattlesnake Logic

After the shock and sadness wears off, there's no doubt that many conservatives will use yesterday's attack by a lone gunman in Ottawa to justify their ongoing anti-Jihad crusade.  I noticed a few conservative-sounding Canadians on the news last night staring into the camera saying this violence, "Is our future!" and that now "We're all in!"   Like we should just accept it as the necessary cost of fighting against our enemies.  

I refuse to accept that awful future they wish for us. I blogged last weekend about Jean Chretien's recent commentary against Harper's decision to send Canada into combat in the Middle East.  I stand by those comments.  We should not be engaging in combat anymore in the Middle East. 

No doubt the two murderers in Canada this week observed a grotesque religious ideology. They may have both been insane.  It'll be very difficult to know the truth now that they're both dead.  But some facts are clear.  They both chose to act after Canada voted to engage in combat against ISIS, not before.   It seems likely they decided to attack Canadian military targets in reaction to the decision by Canada's Conservative government.  We should be thankful the murderers aren't yet attacking civilian Canadians.  But that could easily change.  Hopefully, our law enforcement will be more vigilant in stopping them before more attack in the future.  

Yesterday, just a couple of hours after the shooting started in Ottawa, a beloved uncle, with whom I've often held passionate and interesting political email or in-person discussions, sent this email below to me and another family friend of his.   My uncle's mostly a conservative with rare liberal tendencies.  He's gone off for years on the rabid Jihadist threat, akin to other conservatives we all know.   

I thought I'd share this email string to illuminate my own thoughts on yesterday's terrible events, why they may have happened and how we might react: 

"Subject: Rattlesnake Logic

"The last few days certainly validate that logic in dealing with Terrorists"
"So the gunmen were actually rattlesnakes and not human beings?   Holy mackerel! "

My uncle's reply: 

"That may be your definition of what they are .
My point was/is that there is no more value in trying to talk/reason with these folks , ( who just shoot/ run over people to kill them ) than there is in reasoning with a rattlesnake.
I believe they should be treated as one would treat a dangerous rattlesnake.
If you allow it , they will kill you first.
We see it on our tvs ."

To which I replied:

"They are human beings, yes.  That's not my definition, that's who they are.  

"I don't sympathize with jihadis or their ideology, obviously.  But I also think never-ending Western military colonialism/intervention in the middle east (which we are now engaged in yet again) is the main reason we have these jihadis coming after us.  It's also the main reason why their ranks continue to grow, and why they're even Canadian-born.  The best way to grow the jihadi threat is to launch a U.S-led Western military mission in the Middle East.   I agree with Chretien who wisely kept us out of the last Iraq war, we would've been better not launching our token miltary effort this time, instead to have supported a primarily Arab-country military action against ISIS, and focused instead on humanitarian support in which we could be effective.  

"Rattlesnakes don't attack unless provoked, and we are provoking them.   Maybe instead of killing them all, we should instead leave them alone.  You can say that human beings are no better than rattlesnakes, but that degrades your humanity, not theirs.  And it makes us all targets."

To which he replied:     

"Matt ; if the never ending western intervention makes these poor souls come here and slaughter a few Canadians , what did the Iraquis ,Syrians , Kurds etc ever do to have them kill hundreds of thousands , force them from their homeland , rape and abuse females . (the list could go on )
You are correct that these killers are human ; but as low as one could get, and deserving of ZERO respect.
How you can justify and excuse their actions by blaming others is amazing.

"The very noble Chretien may have had good intentions (  some might wonder at just the sheer delight of refusing a Republican ) but if every good politician did likewise , who/how would prevent the devastation that these “ bad guys “ are causing . Waiting until they run out of bullets is not considered a good strategy by most folks.

"Please call me when you hear about this Arab army actually doing something about the problem.
My bet is that IF it happens , I will get to watch from a different place , and certainly , in a much different time , than 2014 or 15 ."

To which I replied:

"The 2003 Iraqi war removing Saddam Hussein actually laid the groundwork for ISIS's eventual rise.  Hussein could've kept them down.  But he had to go, in Bush's mind.  So the Kurds who wanted Hussein gone still got screwed in the end.  Oops.  
"If the Arab countries view ISIS as a threat, they should take action against them.  

"And this new war is not about saving women and children.  This is about oil and continued control over the region, which is what ISIS is really threatening and why the West is intervening.  There are lots of women and children being threatened by bad guys all over the world and we're not intervening there.  Remember those girls kidnapped by Boko Haram in Nigeria?   The West did nothing to help them.   No oil was threatened.  
"Do I think Canada has a stake in that fight of maintaining Western power in the Middle East?  No."

My uncle:

"Now the subject changes from these poor souls being forced to commit travesties by western intervention, to the 2003 war , oil and control of the land .
Let’s establish if these guys are acting like wild animals or not !!! in my opinion , people that do things these guys are doing , are deserving of exactly the treatment they like to hand out !!!
"The notion that countries like Canada and US , that are energy self sufficient would go to war , because of oil , doesn’t make sense. It’s in their interest to have turmoil in the middle east oil sector , to increase prices. I completely agree that the Arab countries should take action !! If they don’t , who then to protect the weak , or are those “humans” less deserving of sympathy, than the jihadists ??
"War IS  a terrible option !!! But what should one do to stop people like these jihadists ??
Can’t imagine the families of the slain Canadian soldiers feeling very considerate of them today.
"I also agree that we don’t need Western Power in the middle east . Nor do I believe that we can stand  by, when we can help, to restore peace , and then get out."

To which, his family friend chimed in:

"We could be self-sufficient with our oil reserves.
The U.S. may eventually be, but is not currently self-sufficient.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

But then again, Olivia Chow gave her best speech yet last night

I must admit that I'm very torn still about how to vote in the Toronto election, despite my last post.

Some, including myself, previously have said Olivia Chow hasn't articulated a clear and inspiring vision in this campaign.  But this speech at last night's debate in Toronto proves that Chow has finally come into her own as a candidate with a clear and inspiring vision.

This is good stuff from Chow.  I agree with her 100% on Light Rail Trains, or LRTs.  I've always wanted to vote for her.  I'm disappointed the early months of her campaign didn't sound more like this speech.  Had it, we might be looking at a very different dynamic now with less than a week to go before voting day.   Sometimes, it takes a candidate running a major campaign like this months to truly find their legs and voice and reach a crescendo that impresses many.  Kathleen Wynne did that in the Ontario Liberal leadership race, peaking at the right time to win it all.  It seems Chow too is peaking just in time too in terms of her performance.  It may be too late for her to win this race, but hopefully it pulls her out of third place and knocks the awful Fords to the depths they belong.  Then, she'd have my proud vote.

We shall see.

Royson James: "Why I’m voting for John Tory"

I'm pretty much in full agreement with Royson James today. 

Barring some last minute Nanos poll that shows Chow overtaking DoFo for second place in the Toronto mayor race (that would allow me the indulgence of a Chow vote for one last kick at the Scarborough subway extension, as well as a vote for Chow's great cycling plan), I'll be voting for John Tory too, for many of the same reasons listed by James.  

Tory seems to be the leader Toronto wants and needs this time. 

Monday, October 20, 2014

Thug liar Rob Ford tries to intimidate voters at advanced polls into voting for his brother...

What legitimate purpose could Rob Ford have for showing up at advanced polls in Ford Nation country (Wards 7 and 8) and in swing areas like Ward 17 (which sadly voted for Ford in 2010) over the last few days other than to try to intimidate voters into supporting his brother in the mayor's race?

I thought Rob Ford was battling cancer.  For a guy allegedly too sick to campaign for mayor or even for councillor in Ward 2 where the man with a penchant for criminal activity is still on the ballot, he seems to have a lot of time and energy to make public appearances. 

One voter in Ward 17, where Ford ally Cesar Palacio is trying to fend off a serious challenge from progressive Alejandra Bravo, remarked on Instagram, "I cast my vote early and look who was in my way."  See her photo above, published on

Habitual liar Ford claimed he was merely driving old people to the polls.  Then Ford proceeded to hang out for long periods of time on polling station properties where he could be seen by other voters.   He was repeatedly told to leave by polling station staff as political folk like Ford are not allowed in polling stations unless they're official scrutineers.  Apparently, Ford ignored them, forcing the city clerk to write our criminal mayor a letter reminding him of the law.

I'm sure Ford will ignore the letter and make the rounds on Election Day next week to try to intimidate more voters.   The man isn't one for following the rules like the rest of us have to, as we know full well. 

But perhaps the city has had enough of this buffoonery.  Now we're even hearing murmurings from Ward 2 that voters there may be finally tiring of Rob Ford's pathetic act. God, I hope so. 

This week, Doug Ford will be in full desperation mode trying to libel John Tory to save the Ford family's pathetic excuse of a legacy.  I hope the media ignores Doug's bullshit and instead takes him task this week for his brother's repeated malfeasance. 

The Fords must go!

Sunday, October 19, 2014

Chretien reminds us of the noble role Canada once played in the world before Stephen Harper...

There has been much self-righteous and misguided criticism of Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau for his decision to vote against Canadian combat action against the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (or ISIL.)

Conservative types with their knee-jerk support for combat and bizarre romanticism of war see this current tragic conflict as an opportunity for Canada to regain its place as a fighter against the enemy.  I have no doubt that Stephen Harper sees this new Iraq war as a chance for redemption for his Canada after our decision in 2003 to refuse to stand next to George Bush and his misguided invasion of Iraq.   

Generally speaking, these war hawks in the Conservative movement are leading a new holy war.  They have described Islamic radicals such as Al Qaeda and now ISIL as grave threats to world peace.  In truth, these extremists are the results of ongoing Western military colonialism in the Middle East.  In truth, conservatives like George Bush, Stephen Harper and many others are the real authors of this never-ending war and instability.   We will never be safe as long as these neo-con ideologues are calling the shots, literally. 

The private media in Canada largely joined forces with conservatives and others by pouring scorn on Justin Trudeau for his more nuanced position.   They emphasized alleged division in Liberal ranks by pointing out a vote abstention by MP Irwin Cotler and public comments in support of air strikes by Lloyd Axworthy or Bob Rae.

But most Liberals, myself included, felt very comfortable with Trudeau's decision to vote against Canada participating in combat against ISIL at this time.   Our view of the world is not ideological and paranoid like Stephen Harper's world view.

Thus, I was thrilled to see former Prime Minister Jean Chretien make a very eloquent public commentary about this issue and come to the defense of Justin Trudeau with his recent article in the Globe & Mail. 

I especially appreciated this paragraph by Mr. Chretien:

"The legacy of colonialism in the Middle East had not been forgotten and was only exacerbated by the Western military intervention in Iraq in 2003, with the consequences we face today. Unfortunately, Mr. Harper did not understand that history in 2003, and he does not understand it today."

Chretien continues:

"...Given the history of the region and the sensitivities to Western military interventions, I believe that any U.S.-led military coalition [today] should be composed mainly of Arab countries, with minimal participation by other Western countries.

"No one underestimates the Islamic State. But the issues are the best ways to combat it and the best contributions Canada can make. ‎If the region sees military intervention as just another knee-jerk Western show of force, we all know what the long-term consequences will be.

"This is why I believe the best ‎contribution Canada can make is by engaging in massive, not token, humanitarian assistance. It is why in answer to the questions asked of me, I support Mr. Trudeau’s position.

"The Islamic State has created a massive humanitarian crisis. Hundreds of thousands of people have been displaced. Neighbouring countries are dealing with floods of refugees. The World Food Program is almost out of funds and winter is approaching.

"The Prime Minister may believe that not participating in the combat mission means Canada will be sitting on the sidelines. He is absolutely wrong – Canada should be on the front line, addressing the humanitarian crisis.

"For well over 50 years, it has been the Canadian way to open our hearts, our doors and our wallets to victims of great upheavals – Hungarians in the 1950s, Ugandans in the 1970s, Vietnamese boat people in the 1980s, refugees from the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. And I am always thrilled by the great contribution they make after arriving.

"Here are two concrete initiatives I would recommend for Mr. Harper to put Canada on the front lines of the humanitarian crisis while a U.S.-led, primarily Arab coalition focuses on the military crisis.  First, Canada should offer to immediately take 50,000 refugees fleeing the Islamic State. I hope the government will move on this quickly.  Second, the government should immediately allocate $100-million‎ for the World Food Program, to help feed refugees facing a harsh winter."

Mr. Chretien perfectly articulates the position of the majority of Canadians when he writes these words, certainly the vast majority of Liberals.   We know the knee-jerk militarism of neo-conservatives is a recipe for never-ending instability and war in the Middle East.

Reading Chretien's words, we are reminded of a more nobler Canada, a country that once made us all proud.  Sadly, a country that hasn't existed since Stephen Harper came to power.

But a country that can and will exist again when Justin Trudeau gets elected, hopefully as soon as possible.  And on these important matters of world affairs, I'm very glad that Justin Trudeau seems to be taking his advice from the right people, including Jean Chretien.  

Saturday, October 11, 2014

Conservatives like John Tory seem to suffer from ideologically-driven mental blocks when it comes to "privilege"...

Ugh, just when he was doing so well, just days after I endorsed him on this blog, Toronto mayoral frontrunner John Tory told reporters last night that he doesn't believe "white privilege" exists.

It happened in a media scrum after a Jane-Finch area mayoral debate, the only one specifically dedicated to issues facing neighbourhood improvement areas (the term the city gives to its disadvantaged communities) and topics of poverty, racism, policing, and housing reportedly took centre stage. 

Writes Ben Spurr of NOW Magazine: 

"John Tory, who polls place as the frontrunner, has thus far avoided the kind of unforced error that has sabotaged his previous runs for office. But in a media scrum after the debate, a reporter asked him, "Does white privilege exist?" Tory's response: "White privilege? No, I don't know that it does." 
"There are people who are left behind," he continued, "I think what they need is a hand up from people of all different skin colours and religions and backgrounds. That's what really I've been all about for the last number of years."

"The online backlash to his answer was swift, but the truth is he was flirting with this kind of language all night."

This took the wind of my John Tory sails last night for sure.  I heard today from a friend of African-Canadian descent who had been a Tory fan all year who now thinks he can't in good conscience vote for the man.

For me, I know that white privilege exists.  Without asking for it, I benefit from it everyday.  I have all my life.  When I walk down Toronto streets and a police car or police officers pass by, I don't flinch or worry or get scared I'm about to be carded.  Such isn't the case for all black men.  I can safely assume to be able to be treated decently and with respect in virtually all corners of this city (and most parts of North America, if truth be told.)  I know that my country's health authorities have all the statistics long gathered on how a healthy Caucasian male my age, height and weight should live, all of which is easily obtainable online.  I can turn on the TV at any given moment and find faces and stories that somehow reflect my culture and family upbringing on probably 80 to 90 per cent of the channels.  I can go see a Hollywood movie and 95% of the time find that it has a sympathetic Caucasian protagonist or hero, most of them male as well.

To me, white privilege is about as deniable as gravity.  Progressives like me don't want white privilege (or other forms of systemic privilege) to exist; we just can't help but notice the world for what it is.   But conservatives like John Tory seem to have ideological blinders that make it impossible for them to acknowledge such realities.  For them, white privilege is just an invention of the lazy or the people who prefer to engage in what they call, "victimology," or people looking to blame others for their problems.

For conservatives believe that everybody can be successful simply by working hard.  They believe there are no barriers to any advancement.  This position alone stems from a misconception based on their privilege.  Perhaps they refuse to acknowledge all of the privileges they received in their lives (either from their families, or their higher class, or from being inside the establishment, or the Caucasian race, or being male, or being able-bodied, etc.)   For them, they just worked hard, found success and since they can do it, anyone can do it.  And if some people can't do it, well they're just lazy or they didn't apply themselves enough, etc.   Sure, some people need a hand up, as John Tory or others might at least acknowledge.  

As Spurr writes: "These kind of statements, in which Tory emphasizes his own supposed role in improving the lives of disadvantaged people over the efforts of the people themselves, make it sound like he believes marginalized people can't advance without the help of rich, goodhearted people like him. They also ignore broader issues of systemic discrimination." 

Will this kind of talk hurt John Tory's campaign?  I'm not sure.  Toronto is 50% people of colour.  It certainly has hurt his reputation in my eyes.   I would've hoped that a sophisticated Toronto man of his age might've noticed by now that most Toronto black men find it difficult to hail cabs compared to white men or Asian men.  That there are real barriers based on racial discrimination that people of colour have to stare down every day in this city.

In the end, Tory is just another conservative.  He's made it a bit harder for me to vote for him.  He's given progressives more reason to be indifferent to whether or not he can beat Doug Ford.  One commenter said on this blog some progressives see benefits to DoFo winning as DoFo will be unable to achieve much of his agenda due to his poor leadership skills and personality, so into that leadership vacuum will jump other progressive council colleagues and some things may still end getting done (as we've seen in the last couple years.)

I don't buy that.  A Doug Ford win would be telling the world we think the Fords have been just fine, which they have not!  The city needs to move forward and take action on pressing issues, especially the transit crisis we face.  John Tory could still provide that leadership.  Stopping DoFo is still my top priority in this race.  But I do feel more now that I will have to hold my nose tighter in order to vote for John Tory.   Olivia Chow looks better in my eyes, by comparison, because she obviously understands the reality of white privilege and systemic discrimination.  I don't support all of her positions either, but on these issues she's obviously far and away Tory's superior.

But she's in third place for a number of other reasons that remain valid.  Consider me still a reluctant Tory supporter who'll be watching the valid polls (Nanos particularly) like a hawk until voting day on October 27th.  

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

"It's about defeating the Fords, stupid." So I'm voting for John Tory!

Bob Hepburn delightfully sums up the state of affairs for about 65%-75% of Torontonians for whom the only issue in this municipal election is kicking the Fords out of the mayor's office after four years of woeful damage to our city's governance and reputation: "It's about defeating the Fords, stupid!"

Doug Ford is a simple-minded, thug bully who will appoint his brother to be deputy mayor should he somehow squeak up the middle and win on voting day.

But thoughtful, pragmatic, progressive, fair-minded people who aren't committed to far-left ideology are determined not to let that happen.  I'm one of those people.  Together, we will back the candidate who's run the best campaign and has won support across the entire city.  That's why after all these months I'm ready to do it: I'm ready to say I'm voting for John Tory for mayor.

I've always liked Tory, who I view as a moderate conservative with a heart, someone who is cosmopolitan and can finally represent all parts of this city in a way no mayor has since amalgamation in 1997.   I don't agree with everything he stands for, but I like enough of what he's proposed, including the smart policy of re-purposing existing GO rail lines to serve as rapid transit.   He's the only candidate of the three major ones remaining who has a plan that shows vision and creativity.

Olivia Chow seems happy to simply resurrect David Miller's legacy, which got us Rob Ford in the first place.   She's proven completely incapable of selling her plan to a broad swath of voters as she's only ever had to do so in the uber-progressive riding of Trinity-Spadina.  I always worried she wouldn't be the right mayor to unite the city after Rob Ford, and might even inspire a similarly grotesque far-right conservative backlash in 2018, were she to win this year.  But now it seems Chow is heading for big defeat on election night as voters like me switch to Tory to stop Doug Ford in his tracks.

Special memo to Chow supporters who continue to send out their annoying little tweets and attacks against John Tory's proposals, nitpicking on the details (which we all know will be fixed post-election) and trying to argue John Tory and the Fords are one and the same.  They are not and it's insulting to my intelligence to suggest it.   Only a far left ideologue who can't see beyond Kensington Market would believe John Tory is just like Rob Ford. 

In 2010, the city wanted a break from the left-wing experiments of David Miller and his failed management style.  They picked the most extreme opposite they could find in Rob Ford, mostly because no one with more credibility stepped forward.  As much as we hate the personal disasters of Rob Ford and the Ford family, it does seem like the voters in Toronto still want their mayor to lean a bit more to the centre-right.   John Tory can be that mayor, I think.

After so many defeats, it would be great to see John Tory finally win and see what he can do with the management of the city.  He'll be a very good mayor, I predict, should he win.   That's why I'm imploring all pragmatic, thoughtful, progressives to do the right thing: vote for Tory to stop the Fords.   Don't waste your vote on Olivia. 

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Greyhound Canada cancelled my Buffalo, NY bus schedule, didn't tell me, cost me money and then refused to pay me back...

We've all had travel nightmare stories. I've been mostly lucky in my life, at least when it comes to the airline industry.

This story is small potatoes next to most airline horror stories we often hear about. But I thought I'd share it in the hopes of warning the public about Greyhound Canada, a company I used to respect but will no longer ride. This consumer complaints website about how Greyhound has screwed over other customers doesn't have a story nearly as bad as ours, so I feel compelled to share here.

My boyfriend and I booked return tickets from Toronto to the Buffalo, NY airport to catch a flight to Florida earlier this month.  We had ordered our Greyhound tickets in advance in June. On August 28th, I proceeded to the Greyhound terminal at Bay and Dundas in Toronto to pick up our tickets for the Sept 1st departure bus ride to Buffalo and the Sept 5th return ride back to Toronto.  The Greyhound employee saw our order number and printed out our tickets just fine.

The thing is - our return schedule back from the Buffalo airport to Toronto on September 5th had been cancelled. She didn't mention that to me. Greyhound had all of my contact information as I purchased the tickets online months earlier. They knew we were supposed to be on that 6:45 pm scheduled bus ride back from the U.S. to our home country. But they didn't bother to tell us. 

Fast forward to September 5th. Our flight back from Florida to Buffalo arrived back 45 minutes early so we wandered fairly tired around the bleak Buffalo airport trying to kill time.  Then after 2 hours, we went back to the bus pick-up/drop-off location just outside the Buffalo airport. The clock approached our supposed 6:45 pm pick-up. But as 6:45 pm came and went, no bus showed up. Had we been waiting in the wrong location? No. What had happened?  We had no idea.

I called the 1-800-661-TRIP phone number and got the automatic voice message system and was put on hold. Of course, this being the U.S., I had no roaming phone plan (as I hadn't used my phone for the entire trip.) I patiently waited for a human being to come on the phone to try to find out what happened to our bus ride. No Greyhound employee ever materialized.

After 10 minutes, I hung up knowing I was accruing roaming charges. I left my boyfriend by the bus stop and rushed into the airport to try to use a public phone. I found one inside but could no longer see the bus stop. There I called every Greyhound phone number I could find and couldn't get a single human being on the phone. I was on hold for almost an hour. My frustration grew into anger, which grew into despair.

By now, it was past 8 pm and I wandered back to the bus stop to rejoin my boyfriend. He then ran off to go to the bathroom inside the airport and try out the Greyhound website on his iPad as my iPhone internet connection wasn't able to get any schedule information from the Greyhound site. So I waited at the bus stop wondering what we would do. Would we have to pay for a flight home to Toronto? Would we have to get a hotel room and somehow figure out how to get home the next day?  We were exhausted and we just wanted to get home.  It was quite unpleasant considering we weren't even in our own country.

Finally my boyfriend returned to say he learned that Greyhound seemed to have 8:45 pm bus rides back from the Buffalo airport to Toronto the next night and all nights that week. Perhaps there would be one that night as well (although that day's schedules were gone from the Greyhound site.) Finally close to 8:45 pm, another Greyhound bus showed up. I explained the situation to the American driver who apologized and agreed to take us on the bus to the Buffalo station even though we had 6:45 pm tickets.

At the Buffalo bus terminal, the driver confirmed that Greyhound had cancelled our 6:45 pm schedule, but had not told us. I was extremely angry.

Then the farce got worse. We had to transfer buses at the Buffalo terminal, and then wait almost another hour for a late Canadian Greyhound driver to show up. The terminal refused to shut the luggage section on the side of the bus, leaving it open for anyone to gawk at.  I demanded they shut it, but the terminal staffer said it was the Greyhound driver's responsibility to shut it.  I kept a watchful eye on it, frequently hopping off the bus to make sure no thieves came along to steal our luggage. Finally, the unapologetic driver showed up without an explanation and took us across the border. Then a thunder storm hit Ontario, making the ride even more distressful.

By the time we got back to Toronto at 12:45 am, I was livid. I marched into the Toronto bus terminal and gave the Greyhound employee behind the counter a piece of my mind. He seemed more concerned with shutting me up than apologizing. I asked how Greyhound could cancel our schedule, leave us stranded in Buffalo and not inform us even though they had my contact information. He wouldn't answer. I asked if he cared how it felt to be on hold for over an hour, incurring roaming charges, to never reach a human being while stranded and worried. No explanation. In sad, but true private sector form, he just offered us a reimbursement for our ride from hell. I asked what about the extra roaming phone charges I incurred. He told me I'd have to take that up with upper management. I did.

After some emailing, Greyhound Canada's Vanessa Noriega informed me that:  

"Greyhound is not liable for additional expenses. Unfortunately, we will not be able to honor your request...We hope you will not let this incident deter you from using our services and will give us another opportunity in the near future to prove we can be the most reliable and economical form of transportation to meet your needs."

To which I replied:

"You are able to honour my request but you won't. I will not be using your services again as I am afraid after I buy a ticket, you're going to cancel the schedule and not inform me, and put me through hell because of it, and when I incur expenses to try to find out what's happened, you won't reimburse me. I will be blogging about this outrage and doing my best to spread the message far and wide and make sure Greyhound loses business because of this. I'm sure in the end you will lose much more than $28.01 CDN. Foolish, stupid private company!"

Dear loyal readers, if you have any admiration or respect for me, or if you simply value good customer service and want to send a message to a company that doesn't, if at all possible, please boycott Greyhound Canada. I'll be doing so from now on.

Monday, September 29, 2014

The reasons I really like John Tory and may still vote for him...

I have always liked John Tory and, as the polls show him as the best candidate to beat Doug Ford, I hope he does.

If this new poll out today (showing a clear but modest lead for Tory over Ford with Olivia Chow trailing in third) is backed up by Nanos and other pollsters, I will be voting for him.

As this Star article makes clear, John Tory has learned from past mistakes to run a textbook smart campaign this year.  He got in early in the race and has been pacing himself well.  He's been articulate.  He's been clear about his priorities.  He's smartly put a creative and much-needed policy on fixing Toronto's gridlock & transportation crisis at the centre of his campaign. I don't agree with everything he stands for, but I'm comfortable with his moderately progressive conservative positions on most issues. He's not a far-right conservative; he's a moderate.

He's also taken on the Fords in a way I've enjoyed immensely.  His attacks on their nonsense have always struck the right balance between outrage and the need for something better.  He does seem to be the breath of fresh air many Torontonians are looking for. 

All of these factors can be seen in Tory's new TV ad campaign. 

There have been many people quibbling about the details of his Smart Track plan, claiming it's not properly financed or that the proposed route of the track won't work. Tory's batted those criticisms aside like a pro and has remained focused. He's convinced me for the most part. Campaign platforms are rarely perfect and will always need to go through the process of legislative and bureaucratic approvals in order to weed out flaws.

I've been disappointed by Olivia Chow's campaign for mayor. As a downtown gay man, I should have been firmly in Olivia's camp long ago. Her policies have been bang on for me. I support her light rail train plan for Scarborough. I support her ambitious plan to build 200 kms of new bike lanes in the city. I am generally more in agreement with her on most issues than John Tory, whose support for the Scarborough subway extension has disappointed me.

Yet the fact that I and many, many other progressive Toronto residents are considering voting for Tory speaks volumes about his character and his message: Tory's found a way to straddle the great divide between conservative and progressive in a way we haven't seen in a generation or two in Ontario. If polls are correct, Tory leads strongly both in downtown Toronto and most of the suburbs. No candidate running to get elected mayor for the first time has ever done that in post-amalgamation Toronto. It's always been downtown versus the suburbs.

Chow suffers from what I call "NDP-itis," which is the mistaken belief that your far-left, NDP priorities and beliefs are so beautifully superior in and of themselves, you only need to merely put them in the window in order for them to receive massive support. Frequently, those Dippers suffering from NDP-itis can't seem to figure out why their precious priorities fall flat with the public. Chow has put her policies and issues in the window and hasn't truly sold them to the public. When she defends her plan or attacks Tory's plan, it grates rather than convinces. Chow hasn't earned the confidence of Toronto voters or inspired us or made us believe our city will be in strong hands going forward with her in the mayor's chair. I worry that Chow will divide the city in the opposite direction than the Fords.

It now seems clear Chow was a great idea on paper that in practice hasn't lived up to the promise. I wanted to vote for her a great deal. Because of the Scarborough subway issue, I still may. But I'm very tempted to vote for the candidate who's run the best campaign and has managed to unite the city behind his candidacy: John Tory.

If the polls continue to show John Tory in the lead with the awful Doug Ford a strong second, I'll be voting for Tory. All other issues are secondary to me. Fixing our city's leadership with someone who's decent is my only real priority this year and John Tory has earned his position as Ford-slayer.

Friday, September 26, 2014

Very happy to support Andray Domise, running for TO city councillor in Ward 2 against Rob Ford

I shot this short video of Andray Domise, who's running for Toronto city councillor in Ward 2 in this municipal election, last night at a meet-and-greet event.   As you can see, he's an articulate, level-headed, decent guy fighting to make his community better. 

His main opponent is, of course, Toronto's notorious mayor Rob Ford, who dropped out of the mayor's race recently due to health issues and back into his old ward, but has yet to campaign.  Before that, Andray was facing Mikey Ford, the 20-year-old nephew of Rob and Doug who changed his last name this spring to cash in on the family name.  Mikey's mother Kathy shared some crack cocaine with Rob Ford earlier this year in her Rexdale basement. 

Clearly, Ward 2 would do better to pick the better candidate in Andray Domise, who grew up in Rexdale and wants to build up his community in a way that Rob Ford has always failed to do.   I hope the voters of Ward 2 turn over a new page on October 27th and elect Andray.   It's time to do better! 

Check out Andray Domise's website here for more information on this great candidate!